By MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ
Managing Editor
editor@sbnewspaper.com
Antonio G. Limón
After months of infighting and internal conflict, members of the San Benito CISD Board of Trustees have come to a consensus on at least one thing: No one seems to know what’s going on concerning the investigation into Antonio G. Limón, who remains on paid leave as Superintendent of Schools.
On Monday, trustees expressed uncertainty in the status and potential outcome of an investigation that has remained pending since Limón’s May 23 suspension.
Want the whole story? Pick up a copy of the June 26 edition of the San Benito News, or subscribe to our E-Edition by clicking here.
5 comments
Skip to comment form
Another fine example of putting the students first,no wonder they can’t read or write.
If enough citizens write to TEA or call Dr. Ron Rowell-at TEA (who is in charge of school boards and he can send in a TEA MONITOR, TEA will listen. Just look what happened at El Paso ISD and other school districts in the valley.
Paying an interim and Mr. Limon is beyond comprehension. Oh that’s right we forgot, half of the SBCISD school trustees do not even pay taxes in SB.
Why does TEA not get involved and force the Board to stop this vendetta.? Wasting taxpayers money should be a felony. We should have 4 board members facing charges.
This is getting out of control!
When are the authorities going to get involved??
How was it possible to suspend Mr. Limon?? On what grounds?? And then pending an investigation!!
What investigation?? The DAs office is stating that they were never involved in any investigatoin into Mr. Limon!
So what is going on?? These four board members should be charged with something along with Ylianas puppet of an attorney!! Something is not right!! All of this makes no sense!!
I would like to know where those 4 board members are getting the extra superintendent funds. We already have a superintendent and his name is Mr. Limon. While we are at it, when are the employees ever going to get a raise? Several years ago, I remember there was a lone female board member who voted against our raise the first time it was brought up. Or am I wrong Filli?